Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620858›Full record

Articlenpj computational materials2026

Uncertainty-aware machine learning for core-loss background subtraction in EELS.

Bart van der Wielen, Jeroen J M Sangers, Samuel Mañas-Valero, Juan Rojo, Sonia Conesa-Boj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj computational materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bart van der WielenKavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J M SangersKavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Samuel Mañas-ValeroKavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Juan RojoNikhef Theory Group, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sonia Conesa-BojKavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) critically depends on accurate background subtraction, yet standard approaches rely on deterministic parametric fits and provide no statistically rigorous uncertainty estimates. This limitation is particularly severe in the core-loss regime, where the background must be extrapolated into the ionisation-edge window, hindering reliable and automated analyses. Here, we introduce a physics-informed, uncertainty-aware machine learning framework that reformulates core-loss background subtraction as a statistically controlled inference problem with explicit uncertainty propagation. The method combines Monte Carlo replica generation based on empirically determined covariance matrices with neural network ensembles trained on the pre-edge region, and enforces physically consistent extrapolation via an effective-exponent constraint at the edge onset. This approach yields pixel- and energy-resolved background probability distributions, enabling direct propagation of uncertainty to derived spectroscopic observables. Closure tests on synthetic spectral images demonstrate faithful background reconstruction and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates, including in extrapolation regions. Applied to core-loss EELS spectral images of twisted CrSBr, the framework reveals nanoscale, stacking-correlated modulations of Cr L

Indexed as

Materials sciencePhysics

Identifiers

PMID42620858
PMCPMC13485672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.