Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Clinicians' perspectives on machine learning for obstructive sleep apnoea detection: a human factors study.

Abdelrahman Otify, Ian Nabney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdelrahman OtifyCentre for Doctoral Training in Digital Health and Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ian NabneySchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a common sleep disorder affecting 5%-15% of the population, with many going undiagnosed due to accessibility issues and long waiting lists. This is due to the bottleneck method of diagnosis, which is polysomnography. The implementation of machine learning, particularly when applied to a reduced set of physiological signals, has the potential to enhance accessibility and to mitigate the demands associated with conventional polysomnography, a procedure that is inherently time-consuming and labour-intensive. In this preliminary study, 10 clinicians were interviewed to gather their perspectives on the use of machine learning in the domain. Using thematic analysis, key themes were identified, highlighting important considerations on the deployment of machine learning. Findings suggest the need for guidelines and approvals to regulate the use of machine learning, the importance of including medical experts in the process to ensure the best healthcare service is provided and that clinicians lead and not machine learning. The aim is to further the understanding of the complexities of machine learning and understand how to better tailor machine learning to allow for the adoption of machine learning and increase the trust in machine learning by clinicians.

Indexed as

clinicianshuman factorsmachine learningobstructive sleep apnoeaqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID42620838
PMCPMC13485820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.