SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2026
Comparison of clinical efficacy of different acupuncture methods in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia is a complex chronic pain syndrome for which current pharmacological treatments have limitations. Acupuncture, as a complementary therapy, has shown potential, but the efficacy differences among various acupuncture methods remain unclear. Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted by systematically searching commonly used databases up to December 28, 2025, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials evaluating different acupuncture approaches for fibromyalgia. The primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS), with total effective rate (TER) as a secondary exploratory indicator. Results: A total of 26 studies involving 2,037 patients were included. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that acupuncture combined with cupping and medication was superior to medication alone in improving VAS [WMD = -3.81, 95% CI (-6.04, -1.58)] and HAMD scores [WMD = -4.90, 95% CI (-6.15, -3.65)]. Regarding pain improvement (VAS score), a widely recognized core outcome measure internationally, electroacupuncture had the highest SUCRA value (0.99), indicating the highest probability of ranking first within this network meta-analysis. However, it should be noted that this ranking is based on limited evidence (only one small-sample study), resulting in very low certainty of evidence, and thus should be interpreted cautiously. For overall effective rate (TER, a composite endpoint commonly used in Chinese acupuncture trials), floating needle combined with cupping had the highest SUCRA value (0.74). Meta-regression suggested a positive correlation between acupuncture efficacy and treatment duration. CINeMA assessment of evidence quality indicated that the overall quality of evidence ranged from low to very low. Conclusion: Based on current low-quality evidence, the findings of this study should be regarded as exploratory. The SUCRA reflects probabilistic ranking rather than absolute clinical superiority, and these results require further validation in higher-quality studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.