ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Factors influencing ethnic minority medical students' performance in second sit examination.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The variation in levels of performance on educational assessments between students from different societal groups where ethnic minority (EM) students are awarded lower academic outcomes compared to their white counterparts remains a persistent issue across all UK higher education. At Warwick Medical School, the largest graduate entry medical school in the UK, a detailed analysis of all examinations from 2015 to 2024, across all three phases of the medicine course, showed that a statistically significant higher number of EM students end up in second sit examinations in comparison with their white peers. However, in the second sit examinations there was no statistically significant difference in performance. Therefore, the research aim was to explore factors that facilitated EM students' improved performance in second sit examinations and if those factors could be transferred to first sit examinations, the outcomes of which are used for honours degree award. We used a qualitative design and interviewed medical students that have failed, resat their examinations and passed. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: socio-cultural factors, resources, support and personal factors that influenced performance and how addressing these factors improved students performance. The study highlighted the complex and multifaceted factors that contributed to failure and identified strategies to improve performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.