Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620798›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Digital inequality in Ecuador: a multivariate analysis of ICT access and use using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and ENEMDU 2025 data.

Dario Javier Cervantes Diaz, Edgar Rolando Morales Caluña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dario Javier Cervantes DiazCarrera de Derecho, Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Ecuador.
Edgar Rolando Morales CaluñaCarrera de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad Estatal de Milagro, Milagro, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital inequality remains a persistent challenge in middle-income countries, where access to information and communication technologies (ICTs), digital skills, and usage patterns are unevenly distributed across social groups. In Ecuador, despite policy efforts to expand connectivity, significant disparities persist across demographic and territorial dimensions. Methods: This study analyzed digital inequality using nationally representative data from the ICT module of the ENEMDU 2025 survey. A cross-sectional design was applied, incorporating both household and individual data. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Cramér's V, and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) were used. All analyses were conducted in Python using Google Colab, applying expansion factors to ensure national representativeness. Results: Internet access reached 71.3% of households, while 82.4% of individuals reported internet use. However, marked inequalities were identified. Age emerged as the strongest determinant, with substantially lower usage among older adults. Significant urban-rural gaps were observed in both internet access and computer ownership. No statistically significant gender differences were found in mobile phone ownership. MCA revealed distinct profiles of digital inclusion and exclusion shaped by age, education, and territory. Discussion: Digital inequality in Ecuador is multidimensional and structurally embedded. Expanding connectivity alone is insufficient; targeted policies addressing digital skills, access to productive technologies, and territorial disparities are necessary to achieve inclusive digital development and reduce persistent inequalities.

Indexed as

digital inequalityEcuadorENEMDU 2025ICT accessmultiple correspondence analysis

Identifiers

PMID42620798
PMCPMC13485711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.