ArticleDigital health
Development and validation of a deep learning-based model for estimating stroke volume and blood pressures simultaneously using electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac output (CO) is essential for systemic oxygen delivery, but gold-standard measurement using pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution remains invasive. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) devices are widely used but still require arterial catheterization. We developed and validated a deep learning (DL) model that simultaneously estimates stroke volume (SV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) using electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 881 surgical cases at Seoul National University Hospital (Aug 2016 - Dec 2020) with simultaneous ECG, PPG, arterial blood pressure waveform (ABP), SV measured by the APCO devices, and demographics. After signal-quality rules and arterial-line plausibility filters, 20-s ECG/PPG segments were paired SV to form samples. A DL model using ECG, PPG, the first and second derivatives of PPG, demographic variables, and ECG-derived features simultaneously estimated SV, SBP, and DBP. Model performance was evaluated in a temporal hold-out cohort using error metrics, Bland-Altman analysis, and 10-min interval trend analysis. SBP and DBP performance was assessed against ISO 81060-3:2022 criteria. Results: The test set comprised 128 cases (31,637 segments). Our DL model achieved a mean absolute error of 10.761 mL/beat and percentage limits of agreement ranging from -26.905% to 29.563%. SBP and DBP showed mean errors of 0.661 and 1.439 mmHg, with standard deviations of 9.716 and 6.684 mmHg, respectively, meeting the ISO 81060-3:2022 criteria. Conclusion: A DL model using ECG/PPG and demographics can estimate SV with clinically useful performance while simultaneously predicting SBP/DBP, potentially expanding continuous hemodynamic monitoring to non-arterial-line cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.