ArticleBlood science (Baltimore, Md.)2026
Development and validation of a deep learning model to predict heparin response in critically ill patients with deep vein thrombosis receiving continuous intravenous heparin infusion.
Article in Blood science (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous intravenous heparin infusion is widely used for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the intensive care unit (ICU), but accurate prediction of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) remains challenging due to patient heterogeneity and complex drug responses. A deep learning model was developed using heparin administration data, laboratory tests, and patient history to predict future APTT values in ICU patients with DVT. Data from 796 patients receiving continuous heparin infusion were collected, including demographics, comorbidities, treatment, and laboratory information, with external validation performed on 514 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. A 2-layer Long Short-Term Memory model with dropout was trained and evaluated. Optimal performance was achieved with the [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.