ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Improved cognitive flexibility after high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in individuals with Parkinson's disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) commonly experience impairments in both motor and cognitive domains, particularly executive function and cognitive flexibility. While aerobic exercise may benefit non-motor domains, it remains unclear whether high-intensity interval (HIIT) provides superior cognitive benefits compared to intensive continuous endurance training (CT). This randomized pilot study investigated whether HIIT on a stationary bike leads to greater improvements in cognitive performance in PwPD than high-intensity endurance training on a stationary bike, with the aim of providing preliminary evidence of efficacy for a larger-scale RCT. Methods: Twenty people with Parkinson's disease were randomly assigned to either an HIIT group or a control group that performed CT. Both interventions were performed on a stationary cycle ergometer three times per week for three weeks (30 min/session), matched for overall training duration. HIIT consisted of alternating 30-second intervals at 75% and 90% of maximum heart rate, while the control group trained continuously at 85% of maximum heart rate. Primary outcomes included executive function such as cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control assessed by the Trial Making Test (TMT) and Stroop tests. Secondary outcomes comprised aerobic capacity (VO Results: All participants completed the intervention. The HIIT group demonstrated significant within-group improvements in TMT-B ( Discussion and conclusions: HIIT on a cycle ergometer is feasible and well tolerated in PwPD and may preferentially enhance executive function such as cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control compared with CT over a short intervention period. Although exploratory, these findings suggest HIIT could be a promising strategy targeting cognitive deficits in PwPD. However, larger well-powered trails with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these preliminary results and clarify underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.