ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
A qualitative study exploring how an Emergency Medicine leadership programme was received in Ghana.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency Medicine (EM) is a developing specialty in several West African countries, where practitioners are increasingly assuming leadership roles despite limited training. The EM Leaders programme, originally designed for the UK context, offers leadership training tailored to EM. This study explores the reception, relevance, and adaptability of the EM Leaders programme when delivered in the Ghanaian EM context. Methods: This qualitative study used focus groups conducted before and after the EM Leaders programme in Ghana, to explore participants' experiences. Delegates in the programme were EM practitioners from Ghana (and two from Nigeria). The research followed a phenomenological approach with reflexive thematic analysis. Transcripts were analysed, audio data analysis was socio-culturally informed, and findings were triangulated with participants. Results: Seven delegates took part as research participants. Key motivations for leadership learning included the rapid growth of EM as a specialty and early exposure to leadership roles without formal training and mentorship. The programme broadened participants' understanding of leadership beyond management to include teamwork, delegation, problem-solving, and self-awareness. Participants expressed a strong desire to formalise leadership training into local EM curricula. Contextual differences such as language, socio-cultural norms around hierarchy, and feedback practices were highlighted. Adaptations including socio-culturally sensitive examples, slower delivery, and diasporan engagement were suggested to optimise the programme's relevance. The programme inspired participants to explore strategies for embedding leadership skills into their systems, despite challenges with human and financial resources. Conclusion: The EM Leaders programme was positively received and demonstrated potential for applicability within the Ghanaian EM context. Incorporating additional management content, mentorship development, and socio-cultural tailoring could enhance its relevance and impact. Participants endorsed embedding formal leadership training within EM education, acknowledging its importance in an evolving healthcare landscape. This study suggests early signals for the programme's transferability, and yet underscores the necessity of contextualising leadership development to advance global EM development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.