ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Neural correlates of affective self-positivity bias in first and second languages.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An inherent positive bias emerges when individuals perceive themselves compared to when they perceive others. However, for bilinguals, it has been suggested that this self-positivity bias may be sensitive to the language in which information is presented. Methods: In this study, we examine this hypothesis among a group of Chinese-English bilinguals who performed a lexical decision task in their first (L1, Chinese) and second (L2, English) language. During the experiment, brain activity was recorded using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Results: Results showed faster responses and decreased activity in the right medial frontal gyrus (RMFG) for self-positivity compared to other-positivity conditions in the L2 context. However, this identified self-positivity bias in the L2 elicited less engagement of the RMFG than that in the L1. Discussion: These findings reveal distinct mechanisms across languages that underpin the self-positivity bias. Self-positivity bias is processed more embodied in an L1, drawing on richer emotional associations, whereas self-positivity bias is processed in a disembodied way in an L2, which requires integration of affective and lexical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.