ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
NLRP6 as a candidate segmental barrier to carcinogenesis in the human gut: a hypothesis.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health burden, whereas small intestinal cancers are rare despite arising within the same gastrointestinal tract. This disparity suggests that segment-specific epithelial programmes may influence carcinogenesis. NLRP6 is an inflammasome-forming sensor with established roles in epithelial homeostasis, barrier maintenance, mucosal immune surveillance, and host-microbiota interactions. Public human tissue resources, an exploratory reanalysis of currently available single-cell data, and our local colonic cohort, provide hypothesis-generating observations compatible with segmental differences in NLRP6 expression, including very low bulk transcript abundance in human colonic samples. However, the currently available human evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, and does not yet support a simple binary model of presence in the small intestine and absence from the colon. Murine studies nevertheless support biological plausibility, as Nlrp6 deficiency exacerbates inflammation-driven colonic tumourigenesis and impairs epithelial repair. In addition, independent human studies indicate protein-level and clinicopathological relevance of NLRP6 in colonic disease, suggesting that its expression may vary according to segment, cell type, inflammatory context, and disease state. We therefore propose that NLRP6 may function as one candidate component of a segment-restricted epithelial defence and mucosal immune surveillance network in the human gut, potentially shaping CRC-relevant inflammatory and barrier conditions rather than acting as an established human tumour-suppressive mechanism. This model should now be tested through orthogonal human validation, including protein-based assays, spatial and single-cell analyses, and correlation with inflammatory status and clinical outcome, before any biomarker-guided intervention strategies are considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.