ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Experiences of children and adults having a sibling with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a qualitative systematic review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advances in medical care have enabled an increasing number of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) to live beyond early infancy and childhood. However, the burden of caregiving and restrictions on family life markedly impact the siblings of children with PIMD. To our knowledge, no qualitative systematic review has yet explored the experiences of these siblings. Objective: This review aimed to synthesize the experiences of individuals, both children and adults, having a sibling with PIMD. Information sources: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Scopus, Ichushi-Web, CiNii, and MedNar databases between July 31 and August 19, 2024, and on January 14, 2026. There were no restrictions based on language or country. Methods: This review included qualitative studies exploring the experiences of people with a sibling with PIMD under 20 years old. Areas considered included caregiving burden, family relationships, school life, difficulties, challenges, dissatisfaction, and stress. PIMD was defined as an IQ ≤ 40 and an inability to walk unaided; individuals meeting only one of these criteria were excluded. Studies conducted in any setting were considered. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis followed the JBI guidelines for qualitative systematic reviews, and synthesized findings were assessed using the ConQual approach. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 39 findings based on participants' voices. All findings were unequivocal and included data from older and younger siblings. These findings were organized into 12 categories and synthesized into three themes: (1) being with sibling (e.g., growth, acceptance, and the impact on personal time); (2) dynamics within the family unit (e.g., current and future care considerations); and (3) experiences outside the family (e.g., misunderstanding by others and seeking support). According to the ConQual criteria, all three main themes were assigned low confidence ratings. Conclusions: This review underscores the importance of providing comprehensive support to both children and adults with siblings who have PIMD. Although participants reported satisfaction in their relationships with their sibling with PIMD and their parents, they expressed concerns about caregiving responsibilities and their future. Ongoing, multidisciplinary interventions may be required to effectively meet their needs. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024499042.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.