ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Ego depletion, compensatory health beliefs, and healthy food choice in Chinese university students: a two-wave longitudinal study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthy food choice often requires people to balance immediate reward against longer-term health considerations. The present study examined whether ego depletion and compensatory health beliefs (CHB) were associated with healthy food choice in a two-wave sample of Chinese university students. A total of 394 participants completed measures of ego depletion and CHB and a six-trial binary food-choice task at baseline and again 6 months later. Healthy choices were analyzed both at the trial level using a generalized linear mixed-effects model and at the total-score level using a linear mixed-effects model. At the trial level, higher ego depletion and stronger CHB were both associated with a lower likelihood of choosing the healthier option, whereas the ego depletion × CHB interaction was statistically significant but directionally unexpected and treated as exploratory. A robustness analysis based on the total healthy-choice score replicated the negative main effects, whereas the interaction was only marginally significant. In the longitudinal model, baseline healthy choice was the strongest predictor of follow-up behavior, while ego depletion did not independently predict follow-up choice and CHB showed only a trend-level association. Changes in ego depletion covaried with changes in healthy choice, although the observational change-score analysis does not establish causal direction. Overall, the findings point to substantial stability in dietary decision-making and suggest that ego depletion and CHB have modest, primarily concurrent associations with healthy food choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.