ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Interoception in obsessive-compulsive and major depressive disorders.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atypical interoception is a transdiagnostic feature of psychiatric illness. Interoceptive alterations have been demonstrated in both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the nature and direction of differences between patients and controls have been inconsistent, and interoception has not been directly compared between OCD and MDD in the same study. The current study addressed this gap by comparing OCD patients, MDD patients, and healthy controls (HCs) on three different facets of interoception: accuracy (IAcc; objective ability to detect bodily sensations), confidence in interoceptive ability (self-reported ability to detect bodily sensations accurately), and one dimension of interoceptive sensibility (IS; self-reported tendency to notice bodily sensation). Measures of IAcc and confidence were derived from responses in a heartbeat tracking task, whereas IS was measured with the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Noticing subscale. There were no differences between the groups in IAcc. Individuals with OCD displayed lower confidence in their interoceptive ability relative to both HC and MDD, although the pairwise effects did not survive multiple comparison-correction. Lower confidence was also nominally associated with greater obsessive-compulsive symptom severity. Both OCD patients and MDD patients exhibited significantly elevated IS compared to HCs, however, IS did not differ between patient groups. Exploratory analyses suggested a positive association between IAcc and confidence in interoceptive ability within OCD patients, while no associations between IAcc and confidence were found in MDD or HCs. These findings provide preliminary evidence for shared and potentially unique alterations of interoception in OCD and MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.