ArticleAJOG global reports2026
Navigating the complexities of out-of-state abortion training in the United States Post-
Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the United States
objectiveThis study aims to understand the perspectives of trainees and faculty as they navigate the post- STUDY
designThis qualitative study interviewed trainees, faculty from states with abortion bans considering sending trainees for abortion training ("Sending Sites") and faculty from states supportive of abortion that are receiving trainees ("Receiving Sites"). Interviews were conducted over Zoom, transcribed, and interview transcripts were analyzed utilizing Nvivo software for thematic qualitative analysis.
resultsWe interviewed 9 trainees, 8 sending sites faculty and 5 receiving sites faculty across the country. Faculty in states with abortion bans noted many barriers to establishing an out-of-state rotation including funding and legal support. Receiving sites were worried about integrating outside trainees and making sure they got enough experience without negatively impacting their home trainees' training. Regardless of rotation length and level of participation, all trainees reported positive experiences with out-of-state training.
conclusionDespite barriers to developing out-of-state training rotations, trainees value the opportunity to obtain abortion training. Efforts should be made to improve facilitation of out-of-state training opportunities in the post-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.