ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Access to assistive technology in Africa: findings from evidence-informed deliberative dialogues on trade and fiscal policies.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to assistive technology remains unequal in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income settings, where high costs, dependence on imports, and fiscal and trade barriers can limit availability and affordability. This article aimed to present and analyze deliberative dialogues conducted with participants from Mozambique, Chad, Egypt, and Kenya, informed by an evidence synthesis on reducing tariffs and taxes on assistive technology. Three multilingual deliberative dialogues were conducted between August and October 2025, involving 35 participants from different stakeholder groups. The dialogues were used as a knowledge translation strategy to contextualize scientific evidence through structured discussions among different stakeholders. Representatives from the Republic of the Congo were invited but did not participate. Transcripts were subjected to thematic content analysis based on Bardin's approach and organized according to the domains of the SUPPORT tools. The findings revealed common challenges, including high costs, dependence on imports, weaknesses in the implementation of tax exemptions, limitations in local production, territorial inequalities, shortages of specialized professionals, and difficulties in coordination across sectors and institutions. Country-specific issues related to rural access, governance, territorial inequalities, device acceptability, and policy implementation were also identified. The options discussed included fiscal and tariff reforms, strengthening local production, international cooperation, and awareness campaigns. The deliberative dialogues enabled the contextualization of evidence across different national settings and demonstrated that expanding equitable access to assistive technology requires combined strategies adapted to the specific characteristics of each context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.