Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620619›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Access to assistive technology in Africa: findings from evidence-informed deliberative dialogues on trade and fiscal policies.

Emiliana Maria Grando Gaiotto, Mariana Gabriel, Magali Favaretto Prieto Fernandes, Odara Gonzaga de Andrade, Natália Hedlund Jardim, Vinicius Delgado Ramos, Nathan Mendes Souza, Bruno Guedes Alcoforado Aguiar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emiliana Maria Grando GaiottoCentro Universitário Nossa Senhora do Patrocínio, Itu, Brazil.
Mariana GabrielHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Magali Favaretto Prieto FernandesHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Odara Gonzaga de AndradeHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Natália Hedlund JardimHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vinicius Delgado RamosHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nathan Mendes SouzaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bruno Guedes Alcoforado AguiarUniversidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to assistive technology remains unequal in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income settings, where high costs, dependence on imports, and fiscal and trade barriers can limit availability and affordability. This article aimed to present and analyze deliberative dialogues conducted with participants from Mozambique, Chad, Egypt, and Kenya, informed by an evidence synthesis on reducing tariffs and taxes on assistive technology. Three multilingual deliberative dialogues were conducted between August and October 2025, involving 35 participants from different stakeholder groups. The dialogues were used as a knowledge translation strategy to contextualize scientific evidence through structured discussions among different stakeholders. Representatives from the Republic of the Congo were invited but did not participate. Transcripts were subjected to thematic content analysis based on Bardin's approach and organized according to the domains of the SUPPORT tools. The findings revealed common challenges, including high costs, dependence on imports, weaknesses in the implementation of tax exemptions, limitations in local production, territorial inequalities, shortages of specialized professionals, and difficulties in coordination across sectors and institutions. Country-specific issues related to rural access, governance, territorial inequalities, device acceptability, and policy implementation were also identified. The options discussed included fiscal and tariff reforms, strengthening local production, international cooperation, and awareness campaigns. The deliberative dialogues enabled the contextualization of evidence across different national settings and demonstrated that expanding equitable access to assistive technology requires combined strategies adapted to the specific characteristics of each context.

Indexed as

assistive technologydeliberative dialogueevidence-informed policymakingpublic policytax exemption

Identifiers

PMID42620619
PMCPMC13486173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.