ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Clinical evaluation of early implant stability using resonance frequency analysis: a multicenter observational study.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implant stability is an important determinant of successful osseointegration and long-term clinical outcomes. Although novel implant designs continue to emerge, independent multicenter clinical evidence evaluating longitudinal implant stability patterns remains limited. Aim: To evaluate longitudinal implant stability patterns of a novel Grade 23 titanium dental implant system using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) across multiple clinical time points. Materials and methods: This multicenter prospective observational study included 230 patients receiving 295 implants across nine academic centers. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded at implant placement, second-stage surgery, impression making, and prosthesis trial. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric analyses (Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Mann-Whitney Results: ISQ values remained generally high throughout the observation period, with mean ISQ values ranging from 73.06 ± 11.66 at implant placement to 75.07 ± 8.23 at the prosthesis trial stage. Mandibular implants demonstrated higher ISQ values than maxillary implants during the early healing stages ( Conclusion: Within the limitations of this multicenter observational study, the evaluated implant system demonstrated favorable longitudinal ISQ trends during early healing. However, long-term controlled clinical studies incorporating comparative implant systems, radiographic bone level assessment, and extended follow-up are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.