ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a narrative review of neurophysiological mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disorders of consciousness (DoC) following severe brain injury remain difficult to treat, and effective non-invasive therapeutic options are still limited. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has recently emerged as a promising neuromodulation approach in this field. In this narrative review, we synthesize recent evidence on taVNS for DoC across four domains: neurophysiological mechanisms, multimodal monitoring evidence, clinical efficacy, and stimulation parameter optimization with safety considerations. Current mechanistic models suggest that taVNS may influence consciousness through the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, engaging brainstem nuclei such as the nucleus tractus solitarius and locus coeruleus, and subsequently modulating thalamo-cortical and large-scale cortical networks; this remains a biologically plausible working model rather than a validated causal pathway. Preliminary clinical data suggest that patients in a minimally conscious state may respond more often than those with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state; however, this is a subgroup-level signal-the only sham-controlled randomized trial to date found no significant overall between-group difference-and the evidence remains limited by small samples, protocol heterogeneity, and short follow-up. Multimodal tools including electroencephalography, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, heart rate variability, and serum biomarkers may improve mechanistic understanding and responder stratification, but integrated evidence within the same patient cohorts remains scarce. Overall, taVNS appears to be a promising adjunctive intervention for DoC, but its routine clinical application remains provisional until ongoing multicenter randomized trials clarify efficacy, durability, optimal stimulation parameters, and responder profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.