ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Automatic therapy planning based on concept drift.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Static rehabilitation protocols often struggle to keep pace with the dynamic, non-linear reality of human motor recovery. Traditional therapy models frequently assume stationarity, relying on fixed performance schemes that fail to capture the highly individualized nature of human recovery and skill acquisition. This paper proposes an adaptive decision-support framework that integrates concept drift detection within Bayesian Networks to drive a Markov Decision Process (MDP) for automated therapy planning. By continuously monitoring real-time data streams, the system can identify both parametric and structural shifts in a patient's motor control during virtual rehabilitation sessions. These detected drifts serve as signal for the MDP, which searches and recommends an therapeutic adjustment. As a proof of concept, the framework was evaluated using data from healthy participants interacting with the platform and assessed through expert clinical feedback. In this preliminary evaluation, the generated policies balanced engagement with progression, rewarding improvement while penalizing task overload and frustration. While validation in clinical populations remains as future work, the integration of probabilistic tracking and sequential decision-making offers a promising basis for personalized, data-driven virtual rehabilitation in which therapeutic adjustments can evolve alongside the user.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.