Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620474›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Facilitators of professional psychological help-seeking among university students: a narrative review from an individual-environment dual-dimensional perspective.

Chao Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chao LiHenan Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent disparity between the high prevalence of mental health problems among university students and their low rates of professional psychological help-seeking constitutes a well-documented "help-seeking paradox." Research has primarily focused on barriers, while the systematic integration of facilitators remains underdeveloped. In particular, the field lacks a theoretical framework that can account for the dynamic interplay between individual and environmental factors. Using a narrative review approach, this article conducts a thematic analysis and theoretical synthesis of the extant literature. The findings indicate that key facilitators of professional help-seeking among university students can be organized into two overarching dimensions. Individual readiness encompasses three sub-dimensions (mental health literacy and help-seeking attitudes, emotional awareness and regulation, and personality traits and self-efficacy), and environmental driving force comprises three levels: the microsystem (family support and peer modeling), the mesosystem (campus culture and service accessibility), and the macrosystem (cultural values and media narratives). Building on this foundation, the review further examines the mechanisms underlying help-seeking initiation, moderation, and feedback, elucidating the synergistic enhancement or antagonistic inhibition that characterizes the interaction between individual readiness and environmental driving force. The proposed Individual Readiness-Environmental Driving Force integrative model conceptualizes professional help-seeking among university students as a process dynamically shaped by multilevel, multifactor influences, thereby providing a theoretical basis for developing systematic mental health intervention strategies for higher education settings.

Indexed as

facilitatorsnarrative reviewprofessional psychological help-seekingtheoretical integration frameworkuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID42620474
PMCPMC13485963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.