ArticleBrain & spine2026
Coping strategies of neurosurgeons in response to major surgical complications: A nationwide questionnaire assessment in Germany.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to explore the emotional and psychological impact of major surgical complications on neurosurgeons in Germany, focusing on identifying coping strategies, perceived barriers to support, and the influence of institutional culture - particularly in the context of the "second victim" phenomenon. Research question: How do neurosurgeons in Germany handle major complications, and which barriers limit access to psychological support? Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, a nationwide, anonymous online survey was conducted among neurosurgeons working at university departments across Germany. The survey included 18 items assessing demographics, exposure to high-risk procedures, emotional responses to Clavien-Dindo Grade IV/V complications, coping mechanisms, and access to institutional support. Data from 110 completed questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Eighty percent of participants reported experiencing a major complication, with 60% still being emotionally affected. High levels of guilt and self-doubt were common. The most frequent coping strategies were proactive behavior (62.4%), rumination (57.8%) and seeking social support (60.6%). Only 26.4% reported to have had access to formal psychological support - although 82.7% of those without access considered it necessary. Maladaptive coping was more prevalent in low-tolerance error cultures, and early-career surgeons were more likely to externalize blame. Discussion and conclusion: Major complications considerably impact neurosurgeons' mental health. Yet, institutional support remains insufficient. The findings call for mandatory, confidential psychological support, structured debriefings, and a cultural shift toward non-punitive, learning-oriented environments, supported by medical ethics, as a key instrument of cultural change to safeguard both surgeons' well-being and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.