Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Translation direction and word familiarity in word translation: an fNIRS study of intermediate Japanese learners of English.

Wakana Kawai, Kiyomitsu Niioka, Hikari Tanaka, Katsumasa Shinozuka, Yasushi Kyutoku, Ippeita Dan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wakana KawaiApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyomitsu NiiokaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hikari TanakaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsumasa ShinozukaApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi KyutokuFaculty of Global Management, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ippeita DanApplied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Many studies have examined the neural bases of word translation based on the revised hierarchical model (RHM). However, the findings reported thus far, mostly focusing on advanced or elementary second-language (L2) learners, have been diverse and often inconsistent. Thus, to explore possible neural bases for translation asymmetry, there is a distinct need to examine word translations by intermediate L2 learners. Methods: We examined differences in cortical activation patterns during L1 (first language)-to-L2 and L2-to-L1word translation for high and low word familiarity in intermediate-level Japanese learners of English. TOEIC scores were used to confirm intermediate English proficiency, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to examine cortical activation patterns during word translation. Data from 36 participants were used for analyses. Results: Greater activation was observed in the frontopolar area, the pars triangularis of Broca's area, and the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for low-familiarity words regardless of translation direction. Discussion: These findings provide no clear evidence of translation asymmetry in intermediate L2 learners but suggest the possible involvement of concept mediation in both translation directions.

Indexed as

functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)intermediate L2 learnersJapanese-English learnersrevised hierarchical model (RHM)second languageword translation

Identifiers

PMID42620449
PMCPMC13485910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.