Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620429›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Free but declining: the paradox of contraceptive uptake in Burkina Faso.

Marie-Jeanne Offosse, Tozé Namalela, Obasanjo Bolarinwa, Awa Yanogo, Yeri Traoré, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie-Jeanne OffosseHealth Systems Insight (formely ThinkWell Institute), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Tozé NamalelaHealth Systems Insight (formely ThinkWell Institute), Maputo, Mozambique.
Obasanjo BolarinwaDepartment of Global Healthcare Management, York St John University, London, United Kingdom.
Awa YanogoHealth Systems Insight (formely ThinkWell Institute), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Yeri TraoréFamily Health Department, Ministry of Health and Public Hygiene, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Aduragbemi Banke-ThomasHealth Systems Insight (formely ThinkWell Institute), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2020, Burkina Faso expanded its national user fee exemption policy to include family planning services, with the objective of reducing financial barriers and increasing uptake of modern contraceptive methods. This study assesses the national and subnational trends in modern contraceptive uptake before and after the user fee exemption policy amongst women of reproductive age (WRA) in Burkina Faso. Methods: To achieve this objective, we collected routine health facility and demographic data spanning the pre-intervention period (2016-2018) and the post-intervention period (2021-2024). Mixed-effects linear models examined district-level variations in modern contraceptive uptake, while descriptive analyses explored group differences and temporal trends in contraceptive uptake among WRA between 2021 and 2024. Results: At the national level, overall contraceptive uptake (all methods) declined by 3.26 percentage points between the pre- and post-policy periods ( Conclusion: The removal of user fees for family planning services in Burkina Faso was insufficient to reverse declining modern contraceptive uptake with adult women and those living in rural and conflict-affected areas benefiting least. These findings highlight the need for complementary non-financial strategies to improve potential gains of the user fee exemption policy.

Indexed as

adolescent utilizationBurkina Fasofamily planning service utilizationgeographic inequitymodern contraceptivestock-outs

Identifiers

PMID42620429
PMCPMC13485707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.