ReviewJPRAS open2026
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, an underreported consideration in plastic surgery: A narrative review of cases.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) encompasses a variety of collagen disorders characterized by joint hypermobility, skin laxity, and tissue fragility. Evidence to guide plastic surgeons for both elective and reconstructive procedures is limited and consists predominantly of case reports and series. As higher-level comparative data are scarce, synthesizing case-level data remains essential to understand surgical risks, considerations, and postoperative outcomes in this patient population. Methods: A narrative review of case reports and series was conducted using PRISMA guidelines across Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase. Studies from inception to September 2025 were screened for surgical management of patients with EDS. After screening 1816 abstracts with review of 230 full texts, 52 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were collected on demographics, EDS subtype, surgical indication, procedures, perioperative care, and complications. Case-level data were summarized descriptively as counts and percentages, with continuous variables reported as mean (SD) and median (range). Results: The 52 studies described 77 individual cases of EDS, most frequently hypermobile (36.4%), classical (27.3%), and vascular (9.1%) subtypes. The cohort was predominantly female (female-to-male ratio 1.8:1), with a mean age of 31.9 ± 16.6 years (median 28, range 3-64). Reconstruction was the primary indication (67.5%), with additional representation from aesthetic (13.0%). Across case reports and series, frequently discussed strategies included tension-free layered closure, vascular preservation, gentle tissue handling, adhesive supports, and prolonged suture retention. Conclusions: Themes emerged regarding optimal practices for patients with EDS. The techniques emphasized attention to tension reduction, vascular friability, and postoperative supports to mitigate complications in this patient demographic. Heterogeneous reporting in the literature limits the generalizability of findings and underscores the need for standardized documentation. However, these cases represent a potential for developing perioperative strategies and wound-care protocols to guide best practices in this complex population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.