ArticleCureus2026
Spontaneous Rupture in the Posterior Uterine Wall of an Unscarred Uterus.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous rupture of an unscarred uterus is an exceptionally rare but life-threatening obstetric complication. Its diagnosis may be particularly challenging when clinical manifestations are atypical and classical risk factors are absent. We report the case of a 27-year-old gravida 3, para 2 woman with two previous vaginal deliveries and no history of uterine surgery. She presented in spontaneous labor at 39 weeks of gestation. Labor was augmented with oxytocin and resulted in vaginal delivery of a live male neonate weighing 3000 g, with Apgar scores of 9 and 10 at one and five minutes, respectively. During episiotomy repair, abnormal vaginal bleeding was noted despite a well-contracted uterus. Manual exploration of the uterine cavity raised suspicion of a uterine defect, which prompted emergency laparotomy. Surgical exploration revealed a moderate hemoperitoneum and an approximately 8-cm rupture of the left posterior uterine wall of the unscarred uterus extending toward the pouch of Douglas. The uterine defect was initially repaired by primary suturing; however, severe postpartum hemorrhage secondary to refractory uterine atony necessitated a hemostatic hysterectomy. The patient received two units of packed red blood cells and had an uneventful postoperative recovery. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for uterine rupture even in unscarred uteri, particularly when unexplained postpartum hemorrhage occurs despite an apparently normal labor and delivery. Early recognition and prompt surgical management are essential to optimize maternal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.