ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Guidance for clinical variant classification in genes for spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are RNA components of the major and minor spliceosomes that play a core role in splice-site recognition and control of the splicing process. Variants in genes that produce snRNAs are increasingly recognised as major contributors to rare disorders, including neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and retinal dystrophies (collectively termed 'RNUopathies', a subset of 'spliceosomopathies'). Clinical interpretation of variants in snRNAs is, however, challenging and existing guidance to support clinical variant classification does not adequately capture the unique features of snRNAs that necessitate a bespoke approach. Methods: We quantified the elevated background mutation rate in snRNA genes using Results: We detail important considerations for variant classification in snRNA genes. These include: the difficulties of variant identification which requires genome or targeted sequencing approaches, the large number of gene paralogs with high sequence identity that complicate read mapping and variant calling, and historical inaccuracies in snRNA gene annotation. Further we show a ~50-fold increase in Conclusions: We provide the first guidance for clinical variant classification in snRNA genes and anticipate that this will support routine screening and analysis of snRNA genes in clinical genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.