ArticleResearch square2026
Vaginal Pathogenic Bacterial Colonization and Adverse Birth Outcomes among Pregnant Women Living with and without HIV in Tanzania.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Both preterm birth and low birth weight (LBW) remain major contributors to neonatal morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Vaginal pathogenic bacterial colonization has been implicated in ascending genital tract infections, which may trigger these outcomes. However, there is a paucity of evidence on how vaginal bacterial colonization influences pregnancy outcomes, particularly in the context of maternal HIV infection. This study examined the associations between vaginal colonization by pathogenic bacteria and adverse birth outcomes (preterm birth and LBW) among pregnant women living with HIV and HIV-uninfected pregnant women in Mwanza city, Tanzania. Methods: A hospital-based prospective analytical cohort study was conducted between August 2023 and February 2025 among pregnant women who delivered at select health facilities in Mwanza city. Eligible women with singleton pregnancies at ≥ 28 weeks gestation were consecutively recruited during the latent phase of labour. Lower vaginal swabs were collected and cultured via standard microbiological methods to identify pathogenic bacteria. Maternal demographic, behavioural, and clinical data were collected through structured questionnaires and clinical assessment tools. The primary outcomes were preterm birth (< 37 weeks) and LBW (< 2500 g). Logistic regression models stratified by HIV status were used to evaluate associations while adjusting for confounders. Results: A total of 580 pregnant women were enrolled, 70.3% (n = 408) of whom had vaginal pathogenic bacterial colonization. Preterm birth occurred in 14.8% (n = 86) of deliveries, whereas 12.9% (n = 75) had LBW. Infants born to PWLWH had lower mean birth weights than those born to HUPWs did (2.9 kg, 95% CI: [2.8-3.0 kg] vs 3.1 [3.0-3.2] kg; p < 0.001). Overall, vaginal bacterial colonization was not significantly associated with preterm birth or LBW after adjustment for confounding factors among either HUPW (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.13; 95% CI: 0.56-2.27) or PWLWH (aOR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.34-1.72). However, Conclusion: Overall, vaginal colonization was not independently associated with preterm birth or LBW after adjustment for confounders. However, infants of PWLWH had lower mean birth weights, and ESBL-producing bacteria among HUPW may be associated with preterm delivery. ESBL-producing bacteria may be critical and understudied contributors to preterm delivery. Longitudinal studies are needed to inform targeted screening and intervention strategies in pregnancy to address these potentially modifiable factors associated with preterm birth and LBW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.