ArticleResearch square2026
Investigating the repurposing potential of immune checkpoint inhibition for cancer treatment using Mendelian randomisation.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are immune checkpoint proteins involved in tumour evasion of immune suppression. Inhibitors of these proteins are approved to treat cancer patients restricted by criteria such as site and immunologically 'hot' tumour features. To assess their repurposing potential to additional cancer patient populations, we used a Mendelian randomisation approach to investigate the effects of germline proxied plasma PD-1 or PD-L1 lowering on all-cause or cancer-specific mortality risk after diagnosis of cancers with (breast, colorectal, lung, melanoma) or without (ovarian, prostate) PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor approvals. Across the four studied cancers with current PD-1/L1 inhibitor approvals, hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality [95% confidence intervals] per standard deviation decrease in germline proxied plasma protein levels were PD-1:0.91 [0.84-0.98]; PD-L1:0.98 [0.92-1.05]. This suggests failure of the PD-L1 instrument to recapitulate known pharmaceutical effects of PD-L1 inhibition, potentially due to germline proxies not robustly reflecting tumour PD-L1 mechanisms. There was evidence to support PD-1 inhibitor repurposing for a novel indication, ovarian cancer treatment (HR = 0.88 [0.78-0.99]), and to broader colorectal (HR = 0.84 [0.71-1.00]) and early-stage lung (HR = 0.75 [0.61-0.93]) cancer populations than current approvals. Where possible, methodological considerations were addressed but findings should be interpreted with caution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.