ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Habit and the hippocampus: Model-based spatial representations without outcome-sensitive control.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Goal-directed decisions depend on predictions of future outcomes and are thus sensitive to revaluation of expected outcomes, whereas habitual decisions depend on cached action values or stimulus-response associations and are insensitive to outcome revaluation. Hippocampal neurons encode future states (potentially supporting prediction of future outcomes during goal-directed choice) as well as present states (potentially supporting retrieval of state-dependent action values during habitual choice). Prior studies suggest a role for the hippocampus in goal-directed, outcome-sensitive decision making, but few studies have examined its role in habitual, outcome-insensitive action selection. Here, we tested this using a two-outcome spatial navigation task in which identical turning actions (left or right) led either to preferred milk or non-preferred water outcomes, depending on the spatial location at which the choice was made. Rats (20 males, 22 females) were trained under conditions that either required hippocampal-dependent discrimination between choice points or allowed hippocampal-independent navigation using visual beacons. Rats then underwent 24 h water restriction during which separate cohorts underwent Contingency Updating (CU), in which rats re-experienced the maze action-outcome contingencies while thirsty, or Incentive Learning (IL), in which rats received only a two-bottle preference test while thirsty without re-experiencing maze contingencies. Both cohorts were later tested under thirst on an unbaited maze. CU rats shifted their choices toward water-associated responses, whereas IL rats perseverated on milk-associated responses, even when navigation depended on the hippocampus. These results provide novel evidence that hippocampal-dependent navigational decisions can show insensitivity to outcome revaluation, a widely-used behavioral criterion for habitual control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.