Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620216›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

A Framework for Benchmarking Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms.

Neha Talluri, Tristan Figueroa-Reid, Justin Hiemstra, Chris S Magnano, Adam Shedivy, Nistha Panda, Yancheng Liu, Sumedha Sanjeev, Oliver Faulkner Anderson, Altaf Barelvi and 13 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Neha TalluriDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0703-6331
Tristan Figueroa-ReidBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0966-8764
Justin HiemstraMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2993-0308
Chris S MagnanoMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1539-587X
Adam ShedivyMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7840-689X
Nistha PandaDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-4474
Yancheng LiuBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-0565-6171
Sumedha SanjeevDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Oliver Faulkner AndersonBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-9985-4279
Altaf BarelviBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.
Aden O'BrienBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.
Olivia T JohnsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-1832
James A HaddadDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-4007
Spencer A Halberg-SpencerDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8772-9533
Akniyet NurbolBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8538-2127
Iris JanBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7512-2795
Mahunan DegbeloMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-0412-2755
Daniel NachreinerDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Canek Llera-MagordDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Gabriel HowlandBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-5520-7929
Grace H LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6312-0781
Anna RitzBiology Department, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7925-5369
Anthony GitterDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-9833

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Linking Variants to Multi-scale Phenotypes via a Synthesis of Subnetwork Inference and Deep LearningU01HG012039 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven · 2021 to 2026
$3.5M
Computational Inference of Regulatory Network Dynamics on Cell LineagesR01GM117339 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROY, SUSHMITA · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
Defining gene regulatory networks controlling cell fateR01GM144708 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROY, SUSHMITA · 2022 to 2025
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG012039NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117339NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144708NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells coordinate diverse biological processes through interactions among thousands of molecules, but mapping these interactions comprehensively and systematically remains an open problem. Pathway reconstruction algorithms address this problem by linking molecules of interest, identified from high-throughput omics experiments, using prior knowledge encoded as background interaction networks. This process recovers intermediate molecules and interactions that were not directly measured in the experimental data but plausibly connect the observed molecules. It generates testable hypotheses about interactions that drive cell behavior and informs the choice of follow-up experiments. Many algorithms have been created over decades, each optimizing different computational objectives and relying on different assumptions. The resulting heterogeneity has made benchmarking challenging, limiting systematic comparisons. Therefore, selecting an algorithm for a given biological context remains a non-trivial and poorly informed task. This registered report presents a large-scale benchmark of pathway reconstruction algorithms, evaluating 14 algorithms across 822 datasets from four biological settings. To enable this benchmark, we introduce Signaling Pathway Reconstruction Analysis Streamliner (SPRAS), which standardizes algorithm inputs, outputs, and execution into a formal framework, enabling systematic comparison that was previously infeasible. We will assess each algorithm on reconstruction performance against gold standard pathways, algorithm similarity, and computational performance across different biological contexts. Together, these evaluations will provide quantitative evidence for understanding pathway reconstruction algorithm behavior and guiding algorithm selection.

Identifiers

PMID42620216
PMCPMC13484672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.