ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
From individual coping to collective resilience: reframing mental health responses to global crises through geopsychiatry.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global crises are reshaping the conditions under which mental health is produced, threatened, protected, and restored. Pandemics, climate change, armed conflict, forced migration, political instability, economic insecurity, disasters, and digital disruption do not affect mental health only through individual stress reactions or discrete traumatic exposures. They also transform the social, territorial, institutional, ecological, and symbolic environments in which people interpret threat, seek support, access care, maintain hope, and imagine the future. This Conceptual Analysis reframes mental health responses to global crises by moving from an individual-centered model of coping toward a geopsychiatric understanding of collective resilience. We synthesize and extend published conceptual and empirical literature on global mental health, social determinants, disaster psychiatry, community resilience, emotional engagement, collective coping, climate-related distress, migration, structural violence, syndemics, digital environments, and geopsychiatry. We argue that resilience in global crises is not only a psychological capacity located within individuals, but also a collective, territorial, cultural, institutional, digital, and political process. The proposed geopsychiatric model links global crises to mental health outcomes through multilevel pathways involving individuals, relationships, communities, territories, institutions, digital ecosystems, and planetary systems. Emotional engagement, social meaning, institutional trust, access to resources, recognition, and collective efficacy are presented as mediating processes through which crises may either fragment communities or mobilize collective protection. This framework has implications for public mental health, policy, and care systems, suggesting that effective crisis responses should strengthen community supports, trusted communication, social protection, culturally meaningful care, digital responsibility, and climate- and crisis-resilient health systems. Collective resilience should therefore be understood not as a private duty, but as a geopsychiatric condition shaped by relationships between people, places, institutions, ecologies, and futures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.