ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Natural motion statistics unify direction computations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual direction selectivity is typically studied using coherent, unidirectional stimuli. However, natural vision involves more complex, heterogeneous motion fields generated by self-motion and moving objects. How visual circuits extract direction information from these motion fields is not fully understood. Here, we show that On-Off direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) in the mouse retina encode an integrated motion direction from component motion vectors within their receptive fields. Using plaid stimuli with distinct velocity components, we demonstrate that DSGCs maintain unidirectional tuning even when component velocity vectors diverge by over 90 degrees. DSGCs' preferred directions follow the angular mean, rather than the vector sum of motion vectors, a property emerging from the directional tuning of their inhibitory inputs. Intriguingly, while angular mean and vector sum represent distinct mathematical operations, the statistical properties of natural movies cause them to converge onto a single aligned direction, eliminating the necessity of the visual system to choose one operation over the other. We found that DSGCs encode this aligned direction for both optic flow and object motion movies, and the precision of direction encoding depends on the homogeneity of motion vectors in the receptive field. Our findings reveal that the retina performs an initial integration of motion vectors using angular averaging. Since natural motion statistics cause possible motion vector computations to converge, angular averaging effectively informs the animal about the consensus motion direction in natural environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.