Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620084›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Benchmarking Generalizability in Deep Learning-Based White Matter Tract Segmentation.

Junbeom Kwon, Gabriele Amorosino, Franco Pestilli

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junbeom KwonDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0001-8419-5893
Gabriele AmorosinoDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-5193
Franco PestilliDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-0494

Funding

BRAIN CONNECTS: Center for Mesoscale ConnectomicsUM1NS132207 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI TANER AKKIN, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$12.5M
BRAIN CONNECTS: The Axonal Projectome EXchange (APEX)U24NS140384 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Franco Pestilli, Anastasia Yendiki · 2025 to 2026
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS140384NINDS NIH HHS UM1 NS132207Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White matter tracts (WMTs) are the brain's structural foundation for information transfer, underlying essential cognitive and behavioral functions. While diffusion MRI and tractography enable non-invasive mapping of these pathways, automated segmentation often lacks generalizability across diverse data sources. We conducted a systematic, cross-dataset evaluation of four state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, benchmarking their performance across independent datasets with varying acquisition protocols and populations. CNN-based models such as TractSeg achieved the highest within-domain accuracy, but performance dropped sharply under domain shift, most severely when we applied adult-trained models to pediatric data. To address this degradation, we introduce Ensemble White Matter Tract Segmentation (EWMTS), which combines complementary models to partially recover accuracy under domain shift, although performance still falls short of within-domain levels. By openly releasing this benchmark and a reproducible processing pipeline, we provide the neuroimaging community with a framework to develop and benchmark segmentation models across the heterogeneity of real-world neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

BenchmarkDeep learningDomain shiftWhite Matter Tract Segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42620084
PMCPMC13484519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.