ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Deep Learning of Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Ophthalmoscopy for Type 2 Diabetes Classification.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) combined with deep learning can detect metabolic signatures for classification of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design: Cross-sectional analysis of participants included AI-READI dataset (version 3) with FLIO imaging and and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement. Subjects: 1,783 participants from the AI-READI dataset (version 3) with HbA1c measurements and FLIO imaging scans (6,912 total): 671 normoglycemic, 726 prediabetic, and 386 diabetic. Methods: Mean fluorescence lifetime maps were generated using a center-of-mass approach and used as inputs to AI models. We trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), ResNet-18, and XGBoost under three-class (normal, prediabetic, diabetic) and two binary (normal vs. impaired; normal vs. diabetic) classification schemes, using nested 5-fold cross-validation with participant-level grouping. Main Outcome Measures: Macro-averaged accuracy, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: Group-averaged lifetime maps demonstrated consistent spatial differences across glycemic groups, with progressively longer lifetimes from normal to diabetic participants. The CNN achieved the best overall performance in the 3-class classification (accuracy 0.41 ± 0.03, F1 score 0.39 ± 0.02, AUROC 0.58 ± 0.02), compared to the random classifier for 3-class classification (AUROC = 0.50; accuracy = F1 = 0.33). ResNet-18 and XGBoost showed similar performance (AUROC 0.53-0.58). Confusion matrices revealed substantial overlap between classes, with frequent misclassification toward the prediabetes group. Binary reformulation (normal vs. diabetic) improved performance substantially, with the CNN resulting in AUROC 0.63 ± 0.02 and XGBoost 0.67 ± 0.07. Conclusions: FLIO-derived lifetime maps capture metabolic signals associated with glycemic status but yield modest classification performance with current AI models. These findings highlight both the potential and the challenges of using FLIO for early metabolic screening and monitoring, informing future development of clinically applicable imaging biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.