ArticleArXiv2026
Growth and remodeling control shape memory in morphogenetic rods.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical instabilities provide a general design principle for shaping developing organs and engineering soft materials. However, in slender structures, simple elastic buckling tends to erase rather than preserve shape complexity: structures relax to the simplest possible shape, erasing finer detail. Living systems nonetheless build complex, reproducible morphologies from continually remodeling material, while remaining robust to noise arising across scales. Using analytical theory and numerical simulations of a minimal model of growing visco-elasto-plastic rods, we show that remodeling plays two opposing roles: At low plasticity, patterns coarsen through elastic relaxation, while high plasticity converts fluctuations into geometric disorder. This sets a trade-off between shape complexity and reproducibility with an optimal intermediate plasticity, which protects initial patterns. Growth breaks this trade-off by suppressing both failure modes, enabling complex shapes to be reproducibly generated. Our results identify remodeling and growth rates as two knobs governing whether an encoded pattern is remembered, degraded, or transformed.
Identifiers
42620064PMC13484413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.