Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620064›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Growth and remodeling control shape memory in morphogenetic rods.

Nicolas Romeo, David B Brückner, Noah P Mitchell

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas RomeoCenter for Living Systems, University of Chicago, IL, USA.
David B BrücknerBiozentrum, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Noah P MitchellDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Decoding the mechanical interactions between tissue layers sculpting organ shapeR00HD110675 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Noah Prentice Mitchell · 2024 to 2026
$837k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD110675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical instabilities provide a general design principle for shaping developing organs and engineering soft materials. However, in slender structures, simple elastic buckling tends to erase rather than preserve shape complexity: structures relax to the simplest possible shape, erasing finer detail. Living systems nonetheless build complex, reproducible morphologies from continually remodeling material, while remaining robust to noise arising across scales. Using analytical theory and numerical simulations of a minimal model of growing visco-elasto-plastic rods, we show that remodeling plays two opposing roles: At low plasticity, patterns coarsen through elastic relaxation, while high plasticity converts fluctuations into geometric disorder. This sets a trade-off between shape complexity and reproducibility with an optimal intermediate plasticity, which protects initial patterns. Growth breaks this trade-off by suppressing both failure modes, enabling complex shapes to be reproducibly generated. Our results identify remodeling and growth rates as two knobs governing whether an encoded pattern is remembered, degraded, or transformed.

Identifiers

PMID42620064
PMCPMC13484413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.