ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Biomarker-Informed Interpretation of Dyadic Cognitive Function Index Scores in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Participant- and study partner-reported Cognitive Function Index scores may provide complementary information, but it remains unclear whether Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are associated with CFI scores across reporters, reporter-specific imbalance, or both. Methods: Using A4/LEARN screening data (screening sample, N = 1,686; primary dyadic analytic sample, N = 1,682; CDR global score = 0), we jointly modeled participant-reported (CFI-PT) and study partner-reported (CFI-SP) scores in long format to evaluate biomarker associations with CFI scores and biomarker × reporter interactions. As a secondary analysis, we compared tau PET with plasma p-tau217. Results: In an A4/LEARN-adapted regional extent model, reporter balance varied across amyloid regional extent categories, with the largest participant-leading contrast observed in the exploratory restricted early cortical subgroup. Tau PET was associated with higher CFI scores, but this association did not differ detectably between reporters. Plasma p-tau217 showed no clear CFI association or reporter-specific interaction in the A4-derived, amyloid-enriched subset. Discussion: Amyloid regional extent and tau PET were associated with different features of dyadic CFI data: reporter balance and CFI burden across reporters, respectively. Joint interpretation of CFI-PT and CFI-SP may support biomarker-informed interpretation of the instrument, although the cross-sectional findings require replication and longitudinal validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.