ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Treatment Gaps Among Young Medicaid-Enrolled Children with Tooth Decay in Pediatric Primary Care.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To examine whether Medicaid-enrolled preschoolers with untreated decayed teeth received dental treatment within one year of enrollment and identify the factors associated with a treatment gap. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of data from a cluster-randomized trial conducted in 18 community-based pediatric primary care practices in Northeastern Ohio (2017-2022). Treatment receipt was determined using Medicaid claims, with treatment gap defined as fewer teeth with treatment claims than teeth found on baseline exam with decay. Multivariable logistic regression assessed association of treatment gap with child age, sex, race/ethnicity, caregiver education, and number and location of baseline decayed teeth. Results: Of 766 eligible children, 487 (63.6%) attended the dentist within one year. Among 155/487 (31.8%) with baseline untreated decay, 90/155 (58.1%) had a treatment gap. Odontograms visually showed that decay was concentrated on upper anterior and posterior teeth. A treatment gap was associated with a greater number of decayed posterior teeth (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.60-2.30) and decayed anterior teeth (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.51-3.39), both p < 0.001. Other socio-demographic variables were not significantly associated with a treatment gap. Conclusion: More than half of Medicaid-enrolled children attending well-child visits had a dental treatment gap after 1 year. This pattern may reflect dentist's hesitance to restore primary teeth nearing exfoliation and needing multiple dental visits to complete needed restorative treatment. To address this gap, non-surgical interventions such as silver diamine fluoride can be applied by pediatric primary care providers to control the bacteria and prevent disease progression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.