ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A geometric-to-neural cascade for cerebral microbleed detection in susceptibility-weighted MRI.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are established imaging biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease and are a defining feature of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), yet their automated detection in susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) remains challenging due to high false-positive rates from vessel cross-sections, iron and calcium deposits, and other hypointense mimics. We present a fully automated, three-stage cascade pipeline that combines subject-adaptive unsupervised candidate generation with two successive lightweight 3D ResNet classifiers, trained with only human-in-the-loop quality-assurance (QA) labels (yes/no per candidate) rather than dense voxel-wise segmentation masks. The candidate generation stage is performed by fitting a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to each subject's SWI intensity histogram to define an adaptive low-intensity threshold, followed by anatomical masking to exclude physiologically irrelevant regions (image edges, ventricles/CSF/choroid plexus, and cerebellum), and filters candidates by size and sphericity. The model was trained and evaluated across a nested 3×5-fold cross-validation on N = 30 subjects from a publicly available labeled microbleed dataset and a CAA cohort (11,424 CMB candidate lesions) with data augmentation during training. Stage A classifies all geometric candidates as CMB or non-CMB and Stage B refines the predicted positives to suppress false positives (cascade AUC = 0.9587, sensitivity = 0.712, specificity = 0.975, PPV = 0.676, F1 = 0.693). The cascade reduces Stage A false positives by 76.8% (888/1,157 false positives eliminated) while retaining competitive sensitivity. Inference was performed on 141 SWI scans, detecting a mean 40.3 CMBs per scan and being preferred for use in 85% of high CMB cases, as evaluated by a blinded neurologist. The inference pipeline outputs binary CMB segmentation NIfTI images and radiologist-ready QA visualizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.