Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42619630›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Pain Sensitivity, Pain Catastrophizing and Fear-Avoidance in Adult Runners: Injured vs. Uninjured Comparisons and Multivariable Associations.

Paloma Pallante, Andrew Hooyman, Natalia Sanchez, Susan Sigward, Emma Beisheim-Ryan, Jo Armour Smith, Shawn Farrokhi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paloma PallanteDepartment of Physical Therapy, Chapman University, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0794-0946
Andrew HooymanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Chapman University, Irvine, California, USA.
Natalia SanchezDepartment of Physical Therapy, Chapman University, Irvine, California, USA.
Susan SigwardDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Emma Beisheim-RyanExtremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Jo Armour SmithDepartment of Physical Therapy, Chapman University, Irvine, California, USA.
Shawn FarrokhiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Chapman University, Irvine, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersonal beliefs about pain, such as pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance, are believed to influence central pain processing, but their relationship to pain sensitivity in injured runners remains unclear. This study examined whether injured runners exhibit greater pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs compared to uninjured runners, and explored the extent to which pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance predict pain sensitivity.

methodsA total of 235 adult runners (18-76 years) who had been running consistently (1-3 times/week for ≥ 3 months) were included. Using scores from the update to the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire (OSTRC-O2), participants were categorized as uninjured (score = 0) or injured (score > 0). All participants completed the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Between-group differences were tested with independent-sample t-tests and adjusted linear regression models, while PSQ predictors were examined using stepwise multivariable regression adjusting for demographic and training covariates.

resultsInjured runners (n = 91) reported significantly higher scores across measures of pain sensitivity (PSQ mean difference = 1.1, p < 0.001), pain catastrophizing (PCS mean difference = 7.9, p < 0.001) and fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ mean difference = 15.3, p < 0.001). Stepwise regression revealed that greater pain catastrophizing rumination, higher fear-avoidance beliefs and select training characteristics were independent predictors of pain sensitivity (adjusted R

conclusionInjured runners reported higher pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance than uninjured runners. Although catastrophizing rumination and fear-avoidance beliefs were associated with greater pain sensitivity, these cross-sectional findings do not establish causation, and longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether targeting these factors influences running participation limitations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Injured runners reported meaningfully higher pain sensitivity alongside elevated pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs despite similar demographics and training exposure to uninjured runners, highlighting that injury-related pain experience is not explained by running load alone. Pain catastrophizing (rumination) and fear-avoidance independently predicted pain sensitivity, supporting a biopsychosocial model in which cognitive-affective factors uniquely shape the pain experience in runners. These findings identify potentially modifiable targets for clinical screening and rehabilitation (e.g., pain education and graded exposure) to better contextualize symptoms and guide training decisions in injured runners.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesAvoidance LearningCatastrophizationFearPainPain ThresholdRunningAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42619630
PMCPMC13491269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.