Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42619620›Full record

ArticleCancer science2026

Proportion of Screen-Detected Gastrointestinal Cancers From the National Cancer Registry in Japan.

Ryuji Okamoto, Yukai Lu, Taisuke Ishii, Tomio Nakayama, Kensuke Shinmura, Tomonori Yano, Motoki Iwasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryuji OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3422-9676
Yukai LuDivision of Cohort Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-5751
Taisuke IshiiDivision of Health Services Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-4295
Tomio NakayamaDivision of Screening Assessment and Management, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-5096
Kensuke ShinmuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Tomonori YanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1449
Motoki IwasakiDivision of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-4131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, information on routes of diagnosis in cancer registration in Japan lacked reliability. The launch of the National Cancer Registry in 2016 produced a marked improvement in data accuracy. In this study, we aimed to estimate the proportion of screen-detected gastrointestinal cancers using the National Cancer Registry and to examine its correlation with cancer screening participation rates. We analyzed 2016-2020 National Cancer Registry data to identify screen-detected gastrointestinal cancers and assess the correlation between route of diagnosis and stage at diagnosis. Screening participation rates were extracted from the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions (CSLC) and the Report on Regional Public Health Services and Health Promotion Services via e-Stat, and their correlations with screen-detected cancer proportions were assessed using prefecture-level data. Screen-detected cancers accounted for 14.4% for esophageal cancer, 18.6% for gastric cancer, and 21.3% for colorectal cancer. Cancers detected through "other routes (including symptomatic detection)" accounted for 47.1%, 41.6%, and 45.1%, respectively. Screen-detected cases more frequently presented as intraepithelial or localized disease. In gastric and colorectal cancer, positive correlations were observed between the proportions of screen-detected cancers and screening participation rates; for example, correlation coefficients based on the 2019 CSLC were 0.61 for gastric cancer and 0.71 for colorectal cancer. Screen-detected gastrointestinal cancers accounted for roughly 20% of all detected routes. Higher screening rates were correlated with higher proportions of screen-detected cancers. These findings suggest that the proportion of screen-detected cancers may serve as an indicator of screening program quality.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcolorectal canceresophageal cancergastric cancernationwide cancer registry

Identifiers

PMID42619620
PMCPMC13491109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.