Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42619617›Full record

ArticleHeadache2026

Geographic variation in certified headache subspecialty availability in the United States.

Bradley Ong, Nicolas Thompson, Heidi Mueller, Amaal J Starling, Nan Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bradley OngDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-1967
Nicolas ThompsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Heidi MuellerDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Amaal J StarlingDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Nan ChengDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2858-1639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/

backgroundOur objectives were to characterize the geographic distribution and local availability of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists across US counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and to examine associations with socioeconomic deprivation, social vulnerability, and urbanicity. Headache disorders are highly prevalent and disabling, yet local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in the United States remains uneven. Although prior studies have described national and state-level distributions of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists, important gaps remain in understanding county-level availability and disparities in access. Prior state-level summaries may mask within-state differences in access to United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional geospatial workforce analysis of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists in the United States as of January 7, 2026. Practice locations were mapped to counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and compared with general neurologist supply from the National Provider Identifier registry. Estimated population need was calculated by applying a national migraine prevalence to adult population denominators. We examined associations between specialist distribution and county-level socioeconomic vulnerability, urbanicity, and region.

resultsAmong 3144 US counties, 2870 (91.3%) had no United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists, and 2085 (66.3%) had no neurologists. Headache specialists were entirely absent from counties without neurologists. Median county-level headache specialist density was 0 per 100,000 adults, reflecting the absence of local subspecialty care in most US counties. Accounting for county adult population, neurologist density, urbanicity, and region, higher Area Deprivation Index and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with lower headache specialist rates. Each 10-point increase in Area Deprivation Index was associated with lower expected headache specialist rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.82-0.93), and each 0.1-unit increase in Social Vulnerability Index was also associated with lower expected rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.90-0.98). Headache specialist availability relative to estimated population need varied markedly across counties, with substantial estimated local differences between migraine burden and certified subspecialty supply that were not apparent in state-level summaries.

conclusionUnited Council for Neurologic Subspecialties-certified headache specialists are unevenly distributed across the United States, with limited local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and nonmetropolitan counties. County-level analyses identified substantial local gaps in certified headache subspecialty availability that were not apparent in state-level summaries.

Indexed as

CertificationHeadacheHealth Services AccessibilityNeurologistsSpecializationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited Statesgeospatial analysisheadache medicinehealth care accesshealth disparitiesmigraineworkforce distribution

Identifiers

PMID42619617
PMCPMC13653246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.