Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42619544›Full record

SynthesisAustralian occupational therapy journal2026

Systematic review of hospital-based interventions to improve post-stroke independence in activities of daily living.

Tayla Grant, Kylie Wales, Laura Jolliffe, Emma J Schneider, Jade Glascott, Danielle Sansonetti, Avril E Drummond, Natasha A Lannin

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tayla GrantDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3654-3695
Kylie WalesDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3816-3126
Laura JolliffeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1369-9442
Emma J SchneiderOccupational Therapy Department, Bayside Health (Alfred Care Group), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9645-5429
Jade GlascottOccupational Therapy Department, Bayside Health (Alfred Care Group), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6883-7370
Danielle SansonettiOccupational Therapy Department, Bayside Health (Alfred Care Group), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4378-1401
Avril E DrummondSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-8354
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-8345

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship (Monash University)Heart Foundation (Australia) Fellowship 106762Monash Partners Strategic Translation and Research (STAR) Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly after stroke, inpatients commonly experience difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADL). Occupational therapists are key to providing early rehabilitation to optimise recovery. However, the effectiveness of early, activity-based retraining of ADLs is not clear. The aim of this systematic scoping review is to determine whether activity-based retraining targeting basic activities of daily living (b-ADL) and/or simple cognitive instrumental activities of daily living (C-IADL) delivered early after stroke improves functional independence.

methodsMEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase were searched. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised trials, with at least 75% of participants over the age of 18, with a stroke diagnosis, and who received activity-based interventions within the hospital setting. Articles were screened by two authors using Covidence. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool (RoB2). All results were meta-analysed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (V4.0). CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: No consumer or community involvement was included in this study.

resultsA total of 7546 articles were screened, and six studies including n = 254 participants met the inclusion criteria. Performance outcome measure results were meta-analysed; there was no statistically significant impact of activity-based interventions on functional performance (standardised mean difference [SMD] = 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.06, 0.87; P = 0.09). Two studies reviewed quality of life and satisfaction outcomes; data were not synthesised.

conclusionWhereas individual trials suggested improvements early after activity-based training, our meta-analysis showed variability in effects in trials to date. Further research is required to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of activity-based interventions within the hospital setting to guide occupational therapy practice.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingOccupational TherapyStroke RehabilitationHumansRecovery of FunctionStrokeADLhospitaloccupational therapyrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID42619544
PMCPMC13490997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.