Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42619498›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2026

Pudendal nerve entrapment at the level of sacrospinous ligament or Alcock's canal; laparoscopic management.

Baris Mulayim, Sema Mulayim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baris MulayimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Private Clinic, Antalya, Türkiye. brsmlym@yahoo.com.
Sema MulayimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vitale Private Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Pudendal nerve entrapment may occur at multiple sites along the course of the nerve. The Nantes criteria have been proposed for diagnosing pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. However, it is clinically possible to discriminate pudendal nerve entrapment at the level of the sacrospinous ligament from Alcock's canal. Methods: A step-by-step description of the surgical technique is provided based on video images. Results: A 38-year-old woman presented with sitting pain. She experienced pain from the clitoris to the anus on the left side for 2 years. Her pain score was 8/10 according to the visual analog scale. She experienced pain in the left sacrospinous ligament on palpation and showed Tinel's sign (+). The left pudendal nerve block relieved the pain for approximately 2 hours. Pudendal nerve entrapment was diagnosed based on the Nantes criteria. The pain was refractory to conservative treatment. A laparoscopic pudendal nerve release was planned. The surgery was completed uneventfully. After 1 month, her score decreased to 3/10. The Nantes criteria, which have been proposed for diagnosing pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome, were primarily developed to diagnose entrapment at the level of Alcock's canal and/or at the interligamentous plane. Conclusion: It is clinically difficult to discriminate pudendal nerve entrapment at the level of the sacrospinous ligament from Alcock's canal. Therefore, if a decision is made to perform laparoscopic pudendal nerve release, combined decompression at both sites may be considered at the sacrospinous ligament and Alcock's canal if no obvious cause is identified pre-and intraoperatively.

Indexed as

Alcock’s canalLaparoscopic nerve releasePudendal nerve entrapmentPudendal neuralgiaSacrospinous ligament

Identifiers

PMID42619498
PMCPMC13597145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.