ReviewInternational journal of cancer2027
Cross-Regulation Between DNA Methylation and Circadian Clock Reprogramming in Ovarian Cancer: Mechanistic Insights, Biomarker Potential, and Therapeutic Implications.
Review in International journal of cancer, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis remains challenging, recurrence rates remain high, and platinum resistance frequently develops in ovarian cancer (OC), collectively representing major barriers to long-term patient survival. DNA methylation (DNAm), as a relatively stable yet dynamically modifiable epigenetic signature, can capture alterations in tumor states and evolutionary trajectories associated with therapeutic pressure. Meanwhile, the circadian rhythm system regulates multiple cancer-related processes, including DNA damage repair, cell-cycle progression, metabolic adaptation, and immune microenvironment remodeling, thereby influencing OC development and treatment responses. Accumulating evidence suggests the existence of a bidirectional interplay between DNAm landscapes and the circadian clock network in OC. This review summarizes the emerging mechanisms underlying the crosstalk between DNAm and circadian reprogramming in OC, and further discusses their potential applications in early detection, prognostic stratification, dynamic monitoring of platinum resistance, and chronotherapy-based therapeutic strategies. Although current findings highlight the promising translational potential of the DNAm-circadian axis, its clinical implementation remains constrained by tumor heterogeneity, variations in sampling time points, cellular composition complexity, and insufficient validation across experimental models and clinical cohorts. Future integration of time-resolved sampling approaches, liquid biopsy platforms, single-cell and spatial epigenomic technologies, as well as prospective clinical trials evaluating circadian-guided interventions, may further define the translational boundaries and clinical utility of DNAm-circadian coupling in precision diagnosis and treatment of OC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.