ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Population Genomic Screening for Hereditary Cancer Risk: Patient Experience, Perceptions, and Downstream Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population-wide genomic screening (PWGS) offers a novel approach to identifying individuals at risk for hereditary cancer conditions such as Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) Syndrome and Lynch Syndrome (LS). However, limited data exist on patient experiences and clinical outcomes following result disclosure. This study evaluated participant data from In Our DNA SC, a PWGS initiative offering free, CLIA-certified genomic screening and genetic counseling. We analyzed survey and electronic medical record data of participants who received a clinically actionable result for HBOC or LS and who agreed to post-test genetic counseling. Surveys were administered at three time points: pre-counseling, 30-days post-counseling, and 6-months post-counseling. Of 260 invited, 52 participants completed the full survey series. Over half of participants (55.5%) reported being surprised by their genetic test result. Overall satisfaction with the return of results was high (mean > 4.5/5). Most emotional and cognitive responses did not differ significantly between groups, however, participants with LS were significantly more likely to report feeling calm/comfortable, whereas participants with HBOC reported thinking about their results more often. Most participants engaged in follow-up risk management: 80.8% discussed results with providers, 69.2% completed screening, and 51.9% were referred to specialists. Overall, findings support the feasibility and acceptability of PWGS in unselected populations. Future research should investigate the need for tailored support and strategies to reduce attrition to guide implementation of subsequent PWGS initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.