ArticleHGG advances2026
The pleiotropic landscape of rare variant associations with multiple cancers in large biobanks.
Article in HGG advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous association studies between germline rare genetic variation and cancer risk have primarily examined a limited number of cancers in clinical samples, often with participants predominantly of European genetic ancestry. We conducted exome-wide rare variant association analyses across 70+ cancer types using data from more than 729,000 participants from the UK Biobank (UKB) and All of Us (AoU) Research Program cohorts. We used generalized linear mixed models to screen for cancer pleiotropic effects by conducting gene-based and single-variant tests of predicted loss of function (pLoF) and missense variants and six groups of cancer defined by biological and etiological similarities. We then assessed significant genes for associations with 27 individual cancer types that had data for at least 500 affected individuals. Of the 33 potential pleiotropic genes identified, 16 consistently showed significant associations across ≥3 individual cancer types. For example, the presence of at least one CHEK2 pLoF variant was associated with increased odds of diagnosis with 14 different cancers (odds ratio [OR] range: 1.34-3.21). Similarly, the presence of at least one RTEL1 missense variant was associated with lower odds of diagnosis with 9 cancers (OR range: 0.67-0.88). Our results expand our knowledge about these loci and point to a larger impact on overall cancer risk than previously appreciated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.