ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Simulation-Based Education for Health Professionals in Rural and Remote Contexts in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth professionals in rural and remote settings face distinct challenges including geographical isolation, workforce shortages, limited continuing professional development and reduced exposure to high-acuity, low-occurrence (HALO) clinical scenarios. Simulation-based education (SBE) has been proposed as a strategy to address these challenges; however, its design, implementation and evaluation in rural and remote contexts has not been comprehensively synthesized.
objectiveTo map and characterize existing literature on SBE designed and delivered to rural and remote health professionals in high-income countries.
designA scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI guidelines using the participant, concept, context (PCC) framework. Screening and data extraction were conducted using Covidence and results reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
findingsThirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, predominantly from the United States of America (USA), Australia and Canada. Most used quantitative or mixed methods designs. SBE was characterized across six areas: Simulation activity, modality, facilitators, support structures, research methods and learning objectives. Emergency care training, particularly for the management of deteriorating patients and HALO scenarios, was most prevalent. Modalities included simulated patients, in situ simulation, virtual simulation and procedural simulation. Technology-enabling approaches, including telemedicine and mobile simulation units, were increasingly reported. DISCUSSION: Reporting quality was variable. Most studies focused on learner-level outcomes, with limited evidence on system-level, workforce or patient outcomes. Rural-metropolitan collaboration through telemedicine and virtual facilitation was a recurring theme.
conclusionSBE sustains clinical capability in rural and remote settings, particularly for deteriorating patient management, HALO scenarios and for introducing emerging technologies. Further research on implementation, outcomes and workforce impact is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.