ArticleNursing open2026
Students' Online Burnout, Fatigue Situations and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was planned to determine online burnout, fatigue states of students and the associated factors.
designThis study was designed as a cross-sectional type of research. The study is of a quantitative type.
methodsThe universe of this study consisted of all 890 students studying in the Department of Nursing and Nutrition Dietetics at the Faculty of Health Sciences in the spring semester of the 2023-2024 academic year at a university in the east of Türkiye. The sample of the study consisted of 570 students studying in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades. The 'Introductory Information Form' was used to collect data, and the 'Zoom Burnout and Fatigue Scale' was used to determine the students' online burnout and fatigue status. Percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test in independent groups, variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation analysis were used in the analysis of data.
resultsThe mean age of the students included in the study was determined to be 21.77 ± 2.01; 40.9% were sophomores. It was determined that the students received 2.86 ± 1.07 points from the total scale. The maximum score obtained from the scale is 5. It was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the scale and its sub-dimensions according to the difficulty of studying with distance education compared with studying with face-to-face education, difficulty in accessing information sources with distance education and difficulty in using information technologies (p < 0.05).
conclusionsAs a result, students are showing average levels of the Zoom Burnout and Fatigue. In line with these findings, it can be suggested that when delivering theoretical courses via distance education, active learning methods should be used, students' access to course materials should be facilitated and their participation should be supported or encouraged. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Since nursing and dietetics are hands-on profession, practices must take place in a hospital setting and face-to-face. Online education should be used as a supplementary tool. Students should apply the online education they receive to their practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participants provided data but were not involved in the study's design, outcome measures or conduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.