ArticleMedical gas research2027
Machine learning-derived serum carbon dioxide trajectories in predicting prognosis of patients with acute aortic dissection.
Article in Medical gas research, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PvCO 2 ) indicates postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection, and its trajectories over time affecting postoperative adverse outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PvCO 2 trajectories and postoperative adverse outcomes, as well as clinical application through group-based trajectory modeling and machine-learning algorithms. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 642 patients with acute aortic dissection treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2019 to 2024, to determine postoperative adverse outcomes, including 6-month mortality and complications. Three PvCO 2 tests within the first 72 hours of admission were used to analyze PvCO 2 trajectories through group-based trajectory modeling. To diagnose high-risk PvCO 2 trajectories in emergency settings, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was conducted to select key features, which were consequently integrated into predictive models using multiple machine-learning methods. Finally, a web-based interpretable website was developed for predicting PvCO 2 trajectories in patients with acute aortic dissection. Overall, 642 patients were classed into four PvCO 2 trajectories (T1, persistent decrease from a medium to a low level; T2, stable low level; T3, persistent decrease from a high to a low level; T4, stable midlevel), showing distinct patterns. After adjustment for other covariates, postoperative adverse outcomes among these groups showed significant differences, with a higher proportion of postoperative adverse outcomes in the T3 group. Subsequently, upon Shapley additive explanations analysis, 17 features with importance sequence were identified (hemoglobin, direct bilirubin, monocyte, adenosine deaminase, drinking, anion gap, chloride, platelet, lymphocyte, albumin/globulin ratio, calcium, alanine aminotransferase, α-L-fucosidase, D-dimer, antihypertensive drugs, and smoking), which were integrated into the model for predicting T3. The optimal machine-learning model was established for predicting postoperative adverse outcomes. Finally, a web-based interpretable model was developed to predict patients with acute aortic dissection and high risk of postoperative adverse outcomes. This study uncovers heterogeneity in PvCO 2 trajectory, highlighting that decreased PvCO 2 is associated with worse prognosis. A web-based tool for the prediction of acute aortic dissection patients at high risk of postoperative adverse outcomes was constructed to facilitate clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.