Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618964›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2026

New Species Discoveries Refine Global Biodiversity Patterns.

Yangqing Luo, David Lindenmayer, Jens-Christian Svenning, Wen-Yong Guo, Weiguo Du, Zhijun Ma, Jiajia Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yangqing LuoState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-5575
David LindenmayerFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088
Jens-Christian SvenningCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-0862
Wen-Yong GuoZhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Eco-Chongming & Research Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-2042
Weiguo DuState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1868-5664
Zhijun MaState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-9448
Jiajia LiuState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-5964

Funding

Danish National Research Foundation grant DNRF173National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF0802400National Natural Science Foundation of China 32401318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global biodiversity patterns underpin ecological theory and conservation planning, yet the extent to which these inferences are shaped by the ongoing accumulation of taxonomic knowledge remains poorly understood. Here we quantified how terrestrial vertebrate discoveries from 1920 to 2020 reshaped estimated global diversity patterns and their inferred environmental drivers. Estimated diversity patterns remained largely stable for birds, whereas reptiles and amphibians showed notable reconfiguration, with 20.3% and 31.7% of their diversity centers (top 5% of total range-weighted rarity) shifting to new regions, including Australia and Southeast Asia. These shifts were accompanied by changes in inferred environmental drivers, with the apparent influence of temperature declining and precipitation gaining importance for ectothermic groups. Our findings suggest that estimated global diversity patterns and driver relationships for less well-known taxa may be less reliable than often assumed. Continued field exploration and taxonomic work are therefore essential to close critical biodiversity knowledge gaps.

Indexed as

BiodiversityReptilesVertebratesAmphibiansAnimalsBirdsamphibiandiversity centerdiversity‐environment relationshipLinnean shortfallreptileterrestrial vertebrate

Identifiers

PMID42618964
PMCPMC13490281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.